Updating fields in sql

Only the partitions (or subpartitions) listed are checked for matches, and a row that is not in any of these partitions or subpartitions is not updated, whether it satisfies the clause, are flagged as unsafe for statement-based replication.

(This is because the order in which the rows are updated determines which rows are ignored.) With this change, such statements produce a warning in the log when using statement-based mode and are logged using the row-based format when using mode.

updating fields in sql-41updating fields in sql-11updating fields in sql-78

This should be safe to do as long as you don't stop the SQL Agent job. By sending the process a "signal" (similar to in Unix), you can request that it stop at the next convenient moment (i.e. ) and have it clean itself up all nice and tidy-like.

), but for the sake of completeness, I will address this issue here as it was not part of my suggestion in that linked answer.

Since I am suggesting to schedule this via a SQL Agent job (it is 100 million rows, after all), I don't think that any form of sending status messages to the client (i.e.

PDF (US Ltr) - 37.9Mb PDF (A4) - 38.0Mb PDF (RPM) - 37.3Mb HTML Download (TGZ) - 10.3Mb HTML Download (Zip) - 10.3Mb HTML Download (RPM) - 8.9Mb Man Pages (TGZ) - 216.7Kb Man Pages (Zip) - 329.5Kb Info (Gzip) - 3.4Mb Info (Zip) - 3.4Mb My SQL Backup and Recovery My SQL Globalization My SQL Information Schema My SQL Installation Guide My SQL and Linux/Unix My SQL and OS X My SQL Partitioning My SQL Performance Schema My SQL Replication Using the My SQL Yum Repository My SQL Restrictions and Limitations Security in My SQL My SQL and Solaris Building My SQL from Source Starting and Stopping My SQL My SQL Tutorial My SQL and Windows My SQL NDB Cluster 7.5 option as part of a table reference.

This option takes a list of one or more partitions or subpartitions (or both).


Leave a Reply